Online Read Free Novel
  • Home
  • Romance & Love
  • Fantasy
  • Science Fiction
  • Mystery & Detective
  • Thrillers & Crime
  • Actions & Adventure
  • History & Fiction
  • Horror
  • Western
  • Humor

    Exploring Current Trends in Corporate Sustainability Reporting

    Page 6
    Prev Next


      1.Accountability, A.A., 2008. 1000 Accountability Principles Standard, 2008. Accountability.

      2.Adams, C.A., Frost, G.R., 2008. Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices, in: Accounting Forum. Elsevier, pp. 288-302.

      3.Andersen, M.S., 2007. An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustain. Sci. 2, 133-140. doi:10.1007/s11625-006-0013-6

      4.Aras, G., Crowther, D., 2009. Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity? J. Bus. Ethics 87, 279-288.

      5.Assessing Corporate Emissions Perfromance through the Lens of Climate Science, n.d.

      6.Australia, K., 2008. Introduction to the revised AA 1000 assurance standard and the AA 1000 accountability principles standard 2008. Account. Available Www Kpmg ComusenPagesdefault Aspx Accessed Oct. 24 2008.

      7.Ballou, B., Heitger, D.L., Landes, C.E., 2006. The future of corporate sustainability reporting: A rapidly growing assurance opportunity. J. Account. 202, 65-74.

      8.Bardi, U., 2011. The limits to growth revisited. Springer.

      9.Barthes, R., 1981. Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. Macmillan.

      10.Barton, D., Wiseman, M., 2014. Focusing capital on the long term. Harv. Bus. Rev.

      11.Bieler, A., Higgott, R., Underhill, G., 2004. Non-state actors and authority in the global system. Routledge.

      12.Blowfield, M., Johnson, L., 2013. Turnaround Challenge: Business and the City of the Future. Oxford University Press.

      13.Braungart, M., McDonough, W., Bollinger, A., 2007. Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions-a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J. Clean. Prod. 15, 1337-1348.

      14.Briefing, A., 2006. The Materiality Report.

      15.Brown, H.S., de Jong, M., Levy, D.L., 2009. Building institutions based on information disclosure: lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting. J. Clean. Prod. 17, 571-580.

      16.Brundtland, G.H., 1987. Brundtland Report. Our Common Future. Com. Mund.

      17.Carlson, S., 1939. study on the pure theory of production.

      18.Carson, R., 2002. Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

      19.Cheng, B., Saltzman, D., 2010. The Landscape of Integrated Reporting Reflections and Next Steps.

      20.Committee, I.I.R., 2011. Towards integrated reporting: communicating value in the 21st century. IIRC Www Theiirc Org 20 Dec. 2011.

      21.Compact, U.G., 2011. The ten principles.

      22.Creating Shared Value [WWW Document], n.d. Harv. Bus. Rev. URL https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value (accessed 6.16.14).

      23.Daub, C.-H., 2007. Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. J. Clean. Prod. 15, 75-85.

      24.Eccles, R.G., Saltzman, D., 2011. Achieving sustainability through integrated reporting. Stanf Soc Innov Rev Summer 56-61.

      25.Elkington, J., 2004. Enter the triple bottom line. Triple Bottom Line Does It Add Up 1-16.

      26.Environmental indicator report 2012 - European Environment Agency (EEA) [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental-indicator-report-2012 (accessed 6.9.14a).

      27.Environmental indicator report 2012 - European Environment Agency (EEA) [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental-indicator-report-2012 (accessed 6.9.14b).

      28.Forstater, M., Group, B.T., Assurance, L.R.Q., 2006. The Materiality Report: Aligning Strategy, Performance and Reporting. AccountAbility.

      29.Fuchs, C., n.d. The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability. Env. Dev Sustain 2008 10291-309.

      30.Gerst, M.D., Raskin, P.D., Rockstr?m, J., 2013. Contours of a Resilient Global Future. Sustainability 6, 123-135.

      31.Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R., Rajgopal, S., 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. J. Account. Econ. 40, 3-73.

      32.Grayson, D., Nelson, J., 2013. Corporate responsibility coalitions: The past, present, and future of alliances for sustainable capitalism. Stanford University Press.

      33.Hoornweg, D., Bhada-Tata, P., Kennedy, C., 2013. Environment: Waste production must peak this century. Nature 502, 615-617. doi:10.1038/502615a

      34.Initiative, G.R., 2006. Sustainability reporting guidelines, Version 3.0. GRI Amst.

      35.Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G., 2011a. The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harv. Bus. Sch. Res. Work. Pap.

      36.King, M., Roberts, L., 2013. Integrate: Doing Business in the 21st Century. Juta & Company Ltd.

      37.Kolk, A., 2008a. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Bus. Strategy Environ. 17, 1-15.

      38.Kolk, A., 2008b. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Bus. Strategy Environ. 17, 1-15.

      39.Lozano, R., 2012. Towards better embedding sustainability into companies' systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. J. Clean. Prod. 25, 14-26.

      40.Lozano, R., Huisingh, D., 2011. Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 99-107.

      41.Lubin, D.A., Esty, D.C., 2010. The sustainability imperative. Harv. Bus. Rev. 88, 42-50.

      42.Mammatt, J., 2010. Integrated sustainability reporting and assurance, in: Conference Proceedings of the CIS Corporate Governance Conference Held in Johannesburg. Ernst & Young.

      43.McDonough, W., Braungart, M., 2010. Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. MacMillan.

      44.Meadows, D.H., Goldsmith, E., Meadows, P., 1972. The limits to growth. Universe books New York.

      45.M?ller, F., 2010. Photography after Empire: Citizen- Photographers or Snappers on Autopilot? New Polit. Sci.

      46.Morgera, E., 2011. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Handb. Transnatl. Gov. Inst. Innov. 314.

      47.Nolan, J., 2007. Corporate accountability and triple bottom line reporting: determining the material issues for disclosure.

      48.O'Dwyer, B., Owen, D.L., 2005. Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation. Br. Account. Rev. 37, 205-229.

      49.Palenberg, M., Reinicke, W., Witte, J.M., 2006. Trends in non-financial reporting November 2006. Prep. U. N. Environ. Programme Div. Technol. Ind. Econ. DTIE Berl.

      50.Perrini, F., 2006. The practitioner's perspective on non-financial reporting. Calif. Manage. Rev. 48, 73.

      51.Pick, D., Langmann, S., 2013. Dignity and ethics in research photography. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol.

      52.Reed, A.M., Reed, D., Utting, P., 2013. Business Regulation and Non-State Actors: Whose Standards? Whose Development? Routledge.

      53.Securities, Commission, E., 2010. Commission guidance regarding disclosure related to climate change. Final Rule 6290.

      54.Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K., Dikshit, A.K., 2009. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Indic. 9, 189-212.

      55.Sontag, S., 1977. On photography. Macmillan.

      56.Stiller, Y., Daub, C.-H., 2007. Paving the way for sustainability communication: evidence from a Swiss study. Bus. Strategy Environ. 16, 474-486.

      57.Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013, 2013.

      58.Trachtenberg, A., 1980. Classic essays on photography. Leetes Island Books.

      59.Van Wensen, K., MSc, W.B., MSc, J.K., PhD, J.K., 2011. The state of play in sustainability reporting in the European Union. Eur. Union Bruss.

      60.Wheeler, D., Elkington, J., 2001. The end of the corporate environmental report? Or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication. Bus. Strategy Environ. 10, 1-14.

      61.Zadek, S., Merme, M., 2003. Redefining Materiality. Account. Lond.

      Company Reports

      1.Adidas 2012 Sustainability Progress Report

      2.Apple - information online

      3.BMW Sustainable Value Report 2012

      4.BP Sustainability Review 2013

      5.British TelecomBetter Future Report 2013

    &nb
    sp; 6.Carlsberg CSR Report 2013

      7.Chevron Corporate Responsibility Report

      8.Coca-Cola GRI Report 2012/2013

      9.Daimler Sustainability Report 2013

      10.Danone 2012 Sustainability Report

      11.Denso CSR Report 2012

      12.EDF Annual Sustainability Report 2012

      13.EDP Annual Report 2012

      14.Fast Retailing CSR Report 2013

      15.Ford Our Blueprint for Sustainability 2012

      16.Gap 2011/2012 Social & Environmental Responsibility Report

      17.GDF Suez Sustainability: GDF Suez Strategy to Foster Long Term Value Creation

      18.General Motors2012 Sustainability Report

      19.Google Green - information online

      20.H&M Sustainability Report 2012

      21.Heineken Sustainability Report 2012

      22.Honda CSR Report 2013

      23.HP Global Citizenship Report

      24.Hugo Boss Annual Report 2012

      25.Inditex Annual Report 2012

      26.Kellog's2012 Corporate Responsibility Report 2012

      27.Kering Reference Document 2012

      28.McDonalds - information online

      29.Microsoft Citizenship Report 2013

      30.Monsanto 2012 Sustainability Report

      31.Nestl? in Society: Creating Shared Value and Meeting our Commitments

      32.Nike Sustainable Business Performance 12/13

      33.Nissan Sustainability Report 2013

      34.Nokia People And Planet Report 2012

      35.Norsk Hydro Annual Report 2012

      36.Orange 2012 Corporate Social Responsibility

      37.PepsiCoGRI Report 2011/2012

      38.Petrobas Sustainability Report

      39.Prada Annual Report 2012

      40.PVH 2012 Corporate Social Responsibility Report

      41.Royal Shell Sustainability Report

      42.SabMiller Sustainable Development Report 2012

      43.Samsung Sustainability Report

      44.Schneider 2012-2013 Strategy and Sustainability Highlights

      45.Statoil Sustainability Report 2013

      46.Swisscom Annual Report 2012

      47.ToyotaSustainability Report 2013

      48.Vodafone Sustainability Report 2012/13

      49.Volkswagen Sustainability Report 2012

      50.Volvo Sustainability Report 2013

      Footnotes

      1. Stockholm Resilience Centre https://www.stockholmresilience.org

      2. ClimateCounts is an NGO that scores the world's largest companies on their climate impact to enhance corporate climate responsibility. The ultimate aim of the Organisation raise deeper awareness among consumers about the products they buy. https://www.climatecounts.org

      3. The Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) by IPCC provides a clear and up to date view of the current state of scientific knowledge relevant to climate change; there is now high confidence that a warming of up to 2?C above 1990-2000 levels would have significant negative, for example increasing frequency of extreme weather events among others. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/

      4. World Business Council on Sustainable Development, website https://www.wbcsd.org

      5. Radley Yeldar, company website https://www.ry.com

      6. Forbes list of the 2000 world's biggest public companies https://www.forbes.com/global2000/

      7. Application Levels - A, B and C - define the amount of GRI standard disclosures that have been covered in a Sustainability Report https://www.globalreporting.org/reporting/G3andG3-1/application-level-information/Pages/default.aspx

      8. 'Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, individually or collectively, influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of the financial statements. Materiality depends on the size and nature of the omission or misstatement judged in the surrounding circumstances. The size or nature of the item, or a combination of both, could be the determining factor.' The International Financial Reporting Standards https://annualreporting.info/definiciones/material-2

      9. The Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) is a not-for-profit association of companies involved in the automotive industry https://www.aiag.org/staticcontent/about/index.cfm

      10. Forbes List, company website https://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml

      11. Dow Jones Sustainability Index https://www.sustainability-indices.com

      12. Corporate Knights, company website https://www.corporateknights.com/report/9th-annual-global-100/final-results-global-100

      13. Cradle (Oxford Dictionary Definition) - a baby's bed or cot.

      14. For example, I wrote multiple e-mails to the McDonalds person of contact requesting the link to the most recent report; I got a response on the 3rd of April 2014 mentioning that the "The new/current report won't be available for several weeks".

      15. Multiple Capitals Model https://www.forumforthefuture.org/project/five-capitals/overview

      16. EU Legislation on Waste https://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/legislation/

      17. https://www.swissworld.org/en/environment/waste_management/landfills/

      Annexes

      ANNEX 1

      GRI Guidelines - The Global Reporting Initiative promotes use of sustainability reporting as a way for organizations to become more sustainable and contribute to sustainable development. Its Framework is a reporting system that provides metrics and methods for measuring and reporting sustainability-related impacts and performance. The GRI is widely seen as the leading standard for voluntary corporate reporting of environmental and social performance worldwide.

      IIRC Framework - Integrated Reporting is a process founded on integrated thinking that results in a periodic integrated report by an organization about value creation over time and related communications regarding aspects of value creation. The process presumes integrating sustainability thinking across the entire organization and consequently producing an integrate report instead of a mere financial report.

      ISO 26000 Standard on Social Responsibility - provides guidance on how businesses and organizations can operate in a socially responsible way. This means acting in an ethical and transparent way that contributes to the health and welfare of society. It helps clarify what social responsibility is, helps businesses and organizations translate principles into effective actions and shares best practices relating to social responsibility globally. It is aimed at all types of organizations regardless of their activity, size or location.

      The UN Global Compact is a strategic policy initiative for businesses that are committed to aligning their operations and strategies with ten universally accepted principles in the areas of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption. By doing so, business, as a primary driver of globalization, can help ensure that markets, commerce, technology and finance advance in ways that benefit economies and societies everywhere.

      The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises are the most comprehensive set of government-backed recommendations on responsible business conduct in existence today. The governments adhering to the Guidelines aim to encourage and maximise the positive impact MNEs can make to sustainable development and enduring social progress.

      The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)'s mission is to develop and disseminate sustainability accounting standards that help publicly listed corporations disclose material factors in compliance with SEC requirements. Through these standards, along with associated education and outreach, SASB is working to increase the usefulness of information available to investors, and improve corporate performance on the environmental, social, and governance issues most likely to impact value. SASB is working to establish industry-based materiality standards for each of the 88 industries in the Sustainable Industry Classification System? (SICS?) most relevant to all 12,500 publicly traded companies on U.S. stock exchanges.(Grant and Murningham, 2013).

      ANNEX 2

      ANNEX 3

      Annex 4

      Company Name

      Country

      ?

      Nike

    &nb
    sp; USA

      ?

      Adidas

      Germany

      ?

      H&M

      Sweden

      ?

      Kering

      France

      ?

      Inditex

      Spain

      ?

      PVH

      USA

      ?

      Fast Retailing

      Japan

      ?

      Gap

      USA

      ?

      Prada

      Italy

      ?

      Hugo Boss

      Germany

      ?

      General Motors

      USA

      ?

      BMW

      Germany

      ?

      Volvo

      Sweden

      ?

      Volkswagen

      Germany

      ?

      Ford

      USA

      ?

      Nissan Motor

      Japan

      ?

      Denso

      Japan

      ?

      Daimler

      Germany

      ?

      Honda

      Japan

      ?

      Toyota

      Japan

      ?

      Nestl?

      Switzerland

      ?

      PepsiCo

      USA

      ?

      SabMiller

      UK

      ?

      Kellogg

      USA

      ?

      Heineken

      Netherlands

      ?

      Danone

      France

      ?

      Carlsberg

      Denmark

      ?

      Coca-Cola

      USA

      ?

      Monsanto

      USA

      ?

      McDonalds

      USA

      ?

      Petrobas

      Brazil

      ?

      Royal Shell

      Netherlands

      ?

      BP

      UK

      ?

      Statoil

      Norway

      ?

      Chevron

      USA

      ?

      EDF

      France

      ?

      Schneider

      France

      ?

      Norsk Hydro

      Norway

      ?

      EDP

      Portugal

      ?

      GDF Suez

      France

      ?

      Nokia

      Finland

      ?

      British Telecom

      UK

      ?

      HP

      USA

      ?

      Orange

      France

      ?

     


    Prev Next
Online Read Free Novel Copyright 2016 - 2026