positioned to guard both Iraq and Saudi oil, only continuation of a policy was needed. Nigeria, Venezuela, the Alaska
fields, all were an easy reach for the US Military. The oil fields of Russia, operated by the giant Yukos corporation,
were also considered under the Puppet Masters control.
With the status quo under Clinton continued, had Gore prevailed, neither 911 nor the Iraq invasion would have
occurred, and the Iraq oil fields would not be in disarray, unusable, as they are today. The Puppet Master is not
amused. And the Battle between restless Puppets and their Puppet Master, the Bush/Cheney administration rebelling,
has incited further problems in Russia, which considered the Iraq invasion too close to home and sought to protect
itself. Bush/Cheney, as rebellious and arrogant Puppets, have ruined not only Iraq as an oil field, but are now starting
to ruin Russia as a cooperative Puppet. At present, we have Bush/Cheney attacking Russian security and even
attempting to control Russian oil, Russia fearing the Puppet Masters have lost their grip and inclined to take their
assets into their own hands rather than risk a Bush/Cheney rule of the planet, and the Puppet Master enraged. This rage
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta161.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:52 AM]
ZetaTalk: If Gore Had Prevailed
will be directed at Bush, whose arrogance will not protect him from a force far better organized and powerful than any
control of the Executive Branch of the US can muster. Bush is already a king deposed, as he sits over a restless
Congress and agencies that are tired of being made the scapegoat for his disastrous decisions and being treated like
peons.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta161.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:52 AM]
ZetaTalk: New Leadership
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: New Leadership
written Sep 29, 2004
Under Gore, the Earth changes and economic problems resulting from an uptick in disasters would have been the
central issue, and his approach to handling this would likewise have been vastly different from the Bush/Cheney tack.
Gore, as Kerry, entered the fray in Viet Nam, and did not step away into safe zones as did both Bush and Cheney, who
evaded service. This points to a key difference in personality, the ability to face a frightening situation, or the reverse,
an inability leading to the need to create a blockade, a safe zone for the self. Both Bush and Cheney exhibit a
personality that would themselves run for safety at the first hint of danger, would themselves forgo their responsibilities to the greater good, and would themselves consider only their personal safety and comfort during times of duress. This
is what they did during the Viet Nam era, and they assume the public would react as they are prone to do, and thus
anticipating a public that would desert their responsibilities at the first hint of danger, they insist on a tight cover-up.
Gore and Kerry exhibit different personalities, able to confront and engage a threat, and thus would assume a public
that would do likewise, an extension of the self that affects all perception. How would the world differ, if politicians
controlling NASA and the USGS and able to lean on media outlets within the US with National Security directives,
had been under a more stable and mature leadership, as Gore and Kerry represent?
Human cultures are under constant threats, violent weather, droughts and floods, volcanic eruptions, wild fires,
plagues, warfare, and earthquakes. All of this is outside of the average human’s control, and most of this outside of the control of the power structures. Would an uptick in these threats, from nature, cause humans to leave their jobs, their
families, their homes, and run screaming in the streets? The common man waits until the threat is upon them, else
economically they cannot continue to make a living, pay the bills, care for their assets and attend to their
responsibilities. If this were not true, then how does much of the world live under constant threat, yet go through their
day-to-day? A steady uptick in these threats does not change this paradigm. Look to the villages on the sides of
volcanoes who delay evacuation until the eruption overtakes them. The goats must be fed and the fields tended. Look
to the cities along rivers likely to be flooded by deluges upsteam, where evacuation is forgone for a fight against the
flood tide with sand bags and neighbor rescuing neighbor. This is the reaction of the common man, who have their
hearts with their communities, and like Gore and Kerry do not run from this.
in the way the world runs, only increased awareness of potential threats and what steps to be taken in the event. Leave
the coastlines and river basins. Plan on self sustaining communities with gardens and flocks and herds. Expect to
rebuild new homes and barns, using scrap from the devastation along with carefully chosen supplies. Faced with the
potential of losing homes and livelihood, and having to live in a more primitive manner, the public would consider
their options. How does this differ from today, when they anticipate a volcanic eruption or a flooded city? Today, they
expect shops to be open, insurance to cover losses or neighbors to offer help in restarting a homestead devastated. The
potential being discussed would differ in that no such rescue would be possible, as all would be devastated. Thus, the
plan would change. Not just run for cover when the disaster struck, but run for safety with key supplies. Not just run to
a spot just outside the danger zone, but run to a place where rebuilding a community in safety might be possible. Thus,
discussing the potential of a worldwide cataclysm allows the public to plan and prepare in a logical manner.
Boom boxes and video games would be left behind, but the seed stock and gardening tools would be treasured.
Cosmetics and high heeled shoes would not be packed, but Vitamin C and first aid supplies would. The stove and
refrigerator requiring electricity would be replaced by wood burning stoves and dried beans and rice, and frozen meat
with fishing rods and nets. If electricity is a commodity the planner cannot do without, life in the dark or back into the
age of candles and torches, serious plans for wind or water mills and their construction or purchase would be laid. The
throw-away mentality, where one can always buy another pair of shoes or an new outfit, suddenly concerned with the
durability of wool and leather clothing, and how to construct these with a treadle sewing machine or hand tools. Barn
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta162.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: New Leadership
raising techniques, such as the Amish employ today, where teamwork and leverage and hand tools do what a crane or
forklift might do, will be studied and these hand tools suddenly taken out of the garage and well oiled. The attitude
changes, and when the time comes that those with their hearts in their communities are forced to leave, they are
already well on the road to rebuilding sustainable communities elsewhere. This is what Gore would have offered, by
being more open about the Earth changes and less rigid in an increasingly brittle cover-up, and this is what Kerry
would likewise offer and Bush unable, due to his personal inability to deal with threatening situations.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta162.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: An Inconvenient Truth
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: An Inconvenient
Truth
written June 15, 2006
Would the Zetas like to comment on an informative movie called An Inconvenient Truth? It appears the
film is hinting at future flooding under the guise of global warming when in truth the cause are effects of
the pole shift. [and from another] Would the Zetas care to comment about Al Gores statement that we
have only ten years to stop Global Warming?
Al Gore is certainly aware of the pending pole shift, and
the effect Planet X is having on the Earth. As a Vice
President under Clinton, he was an automatic member of
MJ12, and would have learned this from that source if he
was not already cognizant. So why then is he purporting
that the Earth changes are due to Global Warming? Gore
is in a unique position, poised to return to the Presidency
which he was denied. We have stated that he is the de
facto Commander in Chief of the US Military, in their
eyes. The US Military is not alone in considering him the
only legitimate President, since 2000. The vote fraud in
2004 has continued that situation, with Gore the last
person legitimately elected to be President of the United
States, by challenging his loss of position. Kerry lost this
status in the eyes of those backing Gore when he
capitulated, readily, and did not even challenge his loss in Ohio.
The US government has been posed at the brink of a rebellion, to take back the government from those who took it by
fraud in both 2000 and 2004. What is restraining this coup, this return to legitimacy, is the bulk of Congress who are
slavishly obedient to Bush and the vote fraud machine, and the packed Supreme Court. Lately the Supreme Court has
become an unknown, with two new Bush appointees, but the assumption is that they would align with Bush in any
constitutional crisis. Vote fraud was assumed for the future. GOP members of Congress could not miss the promise
electronic voting fraud had of delivering Karl Rove's dream, GOP control forever. Thus intimidated, they followed the
dictates coming from the White House. Vote fraud has lately been exposed, pulled into mainstream media attention by
the Puppet Master, who is steadfastly decapitating the Bush Administration from any influence over the affairs of the world. GOP control of Congress thus can no longer be assured, and in view of the polls must be assumed to be lost.
Thus the time when the US public can be fully informed - about the stolen 2000 election, the fraudulent 2004 election,
the cover-up over 911, the use of the US Military to gain control of the Middle East oil fields, and many other crimes -
is close at hand.
What does this mean for Al Gore? Gore has kept himself in the public eye, coming forth for well publicized lectures on
the need to protect the Constitution, and has retained his following among those who deem him the legitimate
President. For a public announcement that Bush is illegitimate and Gore to replace him in the White House, there is
more than the following among those in government required. The hearts and minds of the public must be ready to
accept the bad news that the White House has been home to a group of criminals by embracing the good news that
someone they respect and are familiar with, in fact elected in 2000 by popular vote, is going to set this right. Thus, the
current press to be the spokesperson for Global Warming has as its real agenda to put Gore into the public view, in a
favorable way. How can he lose, in this current campaign? Global Warming has been the prime excuse for the Earth
changes caused by Planet X, which by general agreement cannot yet to announced to the public. Can Bush counter the
Gore argument by pointing to Planet X? Bush has shown contempt for the changes that a Global Warming excuse
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta293.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: An Inconvenient Truth
would require. He refuses to comply with the Koyoto Agreement, insisting that the US as the greatest consumer of
carbon fuels in the world can continue on this splurge, unabated. He gives lip service only to alternative energy
sources, while backing big oil companies all the way.
Meanwhile the fury and frequency of storms pounding the US is on the increase. Bush, already low in the polls
because of the conduct of the War in Iraq and the loss of jobs in the US, will now have the finger pointed at him on yet
another issue. He is the cause of the storms pounding the US, indirectly, by not taking action on Global Warming
issues. One sees on one hand the compassionate and concerned Gore, detailing the steps that should be taken, and on
the other hand the arrogant and detached Bush, dismissive of any action required and with his Katrina response
standing in stark contrast to Gore. This is a clever approach on Gore's part, which Bush cannot win. He cannot point to
Planet X. He cannot, given the expectations of his backers and cronies, suddenly decide that big oil companies need to
change their ways. He has pushed the US into a debt position so there is no room for funding of alternative fuels unless
he backs out of Iraq or changes his position on tax cuts for the rich. He is trapped, and thus can be assumed to stand in
place, rigid, while Gore captures the hearts of those increasingly affected by the weather changes. Disasters in the US,
sure to come as the Earth changes increase, will likewise focus anger on the Bush Administration for their cuts in
social services. When the time comes to overturn those who have stolen the White House, there will be no contest in
where the affections of the public lie. No need to go to the polls. Gore wins this vote, too.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta293.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Rove Squeeze
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Rove Squeeze
written June 17, 2006 on the live GodlikeProduction Radio show.
Fitzgerald has decided not to indict Rove. Can the Zeta's comment on his decision and secondly can they
give us an update on their discussion concerning the Fitzgerald indictments that were , according to the
Zeta's, delivered to the court on Friday, Oct 21, 2005.
Karl Rove was not excused from indictment because of innocence, a failure on Fitzgerald's part to muster a case
against him. Quite the opposite. This is the story you are hearing from Rove's attorney. Has the public seen the letter
Fitzgerald sent to Luskin, Rove's attorney? Has the public heard from Fitzgerald? It was clear as long ago as the Fall
of 2005 that Fitzgerald had a case against Rove, and for Rove to return to the Grand Jury yet another time in the Spring of 2006 was a signal that he and his attorney were desperate. So what happened? Rove rolled over, under the
unrelenting pressure that Fitzgerald is famous for, and is plea bargaining. The clue to this is the confident and loud
assertion by Luskin that Rove will not be indicted. How could he assert this over the past weeks and months, if he is
not the decision maker? He asserted this because he was bargaining for Rove the whole time, intensely, and knew one
thing for sure. Rove did not want to risk prison, putting his plump pink body into the gang showers, and would sell his
mother to the gypsies to avoid this. It was not a matter of whether Fitzgerald would accept the bargain offered, it was
how far Rove would have to go to satisfy Fitzgerald.
The ultra sealed case, Sealed vs Sealed, so unusual to be almost unheard of in the world of law, indicates one thing.
This case, filed before the judge by the Grand Jury hearing Ro
ve's testimony, was not to be open for review by the
Justice Department, ie Attorney General Gonzales. This is a massive clue as to what the evidence against Rove
included, that George W. Bush was intrinsically involved in the deliberate conspiracy to expose a covert CIA agent.
Where the President and even the Vice President can declassify documents, the motive matters. If this is done simply
for clarification, it's one thing. If the intent is to expose covert CIA operations, quite another. This is treason, a high
crime! One of many Fitzgerald is investigating against the White House. Rove is hardly the loyalist he pretends to be,
as like so many strongly in the Service-to-Self he comes first, without question. Of course, while working in the White
House and chumming up to those he has just stabbed in the back, he'd like this to be kept quiet. To prevent Gonzales
from being able to view the case, as a case titled US vs Sealed would, the prosecutor side was sealed. Only Fitzgerald
can view the case he has filed before the judge.
Where is Fitzgerald going with this? Famous for eating his way up from the bottom, little fish to big fish, he gains
cooperation from underlings until he has a case on the top perpetrators. It has long been rumored by insiders that a
cabal within the federal government is upset enough over the theft of the White House in 2000 and 2004 to take action.
This includes members of Congress, the Judiciary, the Justice department including in particular the FBI, the Pentagon,
and the heart of most of the federal agencies. Given the nature of the Supreme Court, and the slavish obedience the
Republican dominated Congress was paying to Bush, how to go about setting things right? Impeachment was out of
the question, even when treason in placing the US into war on false pretenses was available as the excuse. Breaking
the law on NSA spying only added to the cause, but until the Congress turns into other hands in the Fall of 2006,
impeachment is not a possibility. But the case continues to build! War profiteering by Cheney. Assassination attempts,
well documented. And issues only alluded to recently by the media, such as massive voter fraud coordinated out of the