Given that the arrogant and ambitious Bush Administration can be expected to assume a Bush Mandate, what is likely
to occur?
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g171.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:20 AM]
ZetaTalk: Backlash
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Backlash
Note: written for the Nov 3, 2002 IRC Session
Where ambition is tied up in argument, haranguing, and lack of automatic approval, those concerned with stopping
Bush would sit back and allow the squabble to proceed. This is what would have occurred if the Democrats had taken
the Senate firmly in the elections. The economy, civil rights, and concern for the health and well being of the citizens
of the country would have prevailed, at least in argument, and thus thwarted the Bush Administration plans. Where
those with raw ambitions, and dictatorial tendencies, such as the Bush Administration has exhibited, are given what
they presume to be a mandate, those who are opposed to the outcome must take action, as without action the
ambitions run amuck, driving the country into war, the world into chaos, and the citizenry into subservience under a
dictatorship that has nothing to do with the well-being of the citizens. How then do those who consider that:
1. a pole shift might not happen, and the Republican Party would have to live with the aftereffects of such an
autocratic regime.
2. a war might be instigated where the US Military would be required to fight in the Middle East endlessly, with
no goal in sight except capture of oil producing countries for the Bush cartel.
3. allies world wide, such as Russia, who hold the bomb, might be driven by the disruption in the Middle east to
the extent that they would cease to become allies, driving the US into isolation and a defensive posture.
4. the economic repercussions of isolation would reduce the US to an economic crawl, eliminating hope of
recovery for decades, especially under the cloud of a Republican leadership that was akin to Hitler in its lack of
foresight and treatment of the citizens of the world.
Place into the posture of those thus concerned the wealthy elite of the world, which includes the banking cartels, global
corporations, and the US Military as well as the governing elite of other super powers in the world. How would they
treat an arrogant strutting brat, full of himself in his assumption that what he terms a Bush Mandate has been given to
him, and about to start a war which the world has warned should not be undertaken for simply the obvious ambitions
of the war monger? They will eliminate him, promptly, and all about him who fail to take the message will likewise to
eliminated from power. Thus, the rumors of a potential assassination, akin to the JFK assassinations which had little to
do with the stated excuse, may become a reality.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g172.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:20 AM]
ZetaTalk: Walk-In
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Walk-In
Note: written during the Nov 9, 2002 IRC Session
The current US President is not a strong individual, as much as a puppet. A drunk in his younger years, with cocaine
addiction running in the family, hard, this is not a likely family to be strong against the coming times. Chosen for his
weakness, he will likely start to falter when times get tight and explanations are demanded of him. It will not so much
be his failure to care for the populace he is sworn to serve that will bother him, as the failure of plans the elite have
laid that will not pan out. Thus, he will turn to the bottle, and if restricted, will start to mentally falter. Given slips, and
inability to go on stage, he will likely be assassinated by his handlers. However, failing this, a walk-in is likely, as a
possession would be so obvious that assassination would become immediate.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g173.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:21 AM]
ZetaTalk: Decapitation Process
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Decapitation Process
written Aug 19, 2005
I am concerned about all the reports about military coup happening. 4-Star General gets canned. Is there
really a war going on behind the scenes between the Bush crowd and the powers that be? I am trying to
figure out all the gossip about a military coup. Where are we headed? And what is behind the exorbitant
crude oil prices? Any Zetas comments on this?
We stated when Bush stole the 2004 election that the Puppet Master was furious, as he had wanted a respected Viet Nam vet, John Kerry, to bring a rebelling US military into line, a situation that certainly would not occur with Bush
continuing in office. Why does the Puppet Master care? Because the US Military has and is being used to protect his
assets and interests, at home and abroad. The massive US Military, equal in size to the combined military of all other
countries in the world, has bases everywhere, and the man with the gun gets cooperation with US interests abroad.
Chosen as much for their weaknesses as for any skill or political savvy they may posses, Puppets are expected to allow their strings to be pulled, once installed into office, but Bush and those around him had let the power of the US
Military go to their heads. They would be king. They would commandeer all the oil fields in the world, and control what they foresee as the prime commodity in the Aftertime, black gold.
Bush busting promptly began, the first volley financial. Despite all lies to the contrary, the health of the US economy is plunging, more layoffs, more bankruptcies, overinflated and underfunded and utterly dependent upon investors from
abroad. What has the situation been since the 2004 election was stolen? Rising interest rates at the Federal Reserve,
which the Puppet Master controls, while the US economy plunges. Logical only when one considers that the Puppet
Master plans to decapitate the US bureaucracy, and plunging the US government into a financial crisis with a sudden
withdrawal of funds from the Fed and from countries abroad which he has great influence with, will be one weapon at
his disposal. Bush, meanwhile, having formerly been an alcoholic, is now drunk on continued spending sprees, his
foray into Iraq a hemorrhage he refuses to address. Weapon one - financial disaster, with the US Congress frantically
looking to cut expenses in the face of the Bush Administration's adamant insistence that their conquest of oil fields
continue, and now into Iran.
The second Bush busting volley is unveiling political corruption within the Bush Administration. Shall we count the
ways this has emerged? The Downing Street memo, demonstrating clearly that Bush lied to the public about his plans
to invade Iraq; the Valerie Plame outing, which has Karl Rove and the office of Dick Cheney front and center and is
currently before a grand jury; war profiteering via Haliburton, with contracts skipping the bidding process and
fraudulent invoices being rewarded with bonuses. Where this is not yet seen as removing Bush from office, it has an
eroding effect on the Congress and the public. Little by little the fingers of loyalty weaken and let go. Where the public
stance is loyalty to a President that had been sworn in, in front of a Congress that failed to challenge the 2004 election,
the depth of this loyalty is now paper thin. Election fraud, via Diebolt voting machines that had votes for 1/3 of the
nation recorded without a paper trail and the central
tabulating machines admittedly editable from a laptop in a parking
lot nearby - all ignored by the loyal Republican Congress. With the 2006 elections approaching in the Fall of 2005,
should a Congressman worry? Weapon two - the changing face of Congress.
The third Bush busting volley is eroding public sentiment for what Bush had hoped would be a war time Presidency.
What war? The one that was waged based on a lie? The one that was for any reason but to defend America from
terrorism? The one that was to make America free from worry, a safer place? For public sentiment to erode, the media
must cooperate, and anyone taking the pulse of the media lately must admit there has been a change. Look behind the
newscasters to see the hand at the helm of the major media outlets. It is not Bush and company. Though they can
suppress reports by asserting a national security rational, they cannot dictate the tenor and tone of the news. Where the
Downing Street memo received little press, Karl Rove was dragged about on major media endlessly for his alleged role
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta236.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:22 AM]
ZetaTalk: Decapitation Process
in the Plame outing. Public exposes are not over in this battle for the hearts and minds of the US public, as more are in
the wings and awaiting their time. The public has already decided they no longer approve of their President, not for his
performance in Iraq, nor on the economy, and there is little left except respect for the Office of President to shore him
up. Weapon three - an angry public.
What is the synergy, during a decapitation process, between economic quagmires, Congressional alarm, public
disgruntlement, and the Military balking? Each magnifies the other. A war effort that has strong public support does
not get challenged by Congress, regardless of legalities. A President viewed as genuinely concerned about the public
interests is forgiven economic quagmires by the public. And when the argument is that national security is at stake, the
safety of the American public at issue, then the media hesitates to criticize the leadership. But when this leadership has
been exposed as utterly lacking in integrity, out for self profit, and breaking both the intent and letter of the law with
aplomb, what then? When Congress begins to vote against the Bush White House wishes, what then? When the public
polls show the support for the President and his policies diving for the bottom, what then? A feeding frenzy begins.
Where this has terrified some within the Bush White House, the prevailing mode has been stubborn refusal to change.
This is not the resolve of strength, but the rigidity of the weak. This is the 2 year old, having a tantrum, insisting on his
way.
Enter the role of the military. They were, of course, disappointed to have as their assigned Commander-in-Chief a man
who avoided his duty during the Viet Nam war to the extent of being AWOL in the reserves. The truth of this was not
lost on the military, which has its own information channels, but the military is restrained from speaking out against a
sitting Commander-in-Chief, so the truth of this is lost on the public. They did, of course, advise against invading Iraq,
and were bitter when their advise was not taken. Follow this with a disastrous Rumsfeld plan to rush to Baghdad,
leaving the supply routes vulnerable, and you have the setting we see today in Iraq, endless battles and endless dead
and maimed soldiers. Moral is far worse than during Viet Nam, a story not allowed to be told. Where the military is
based on command and control hierarchy, in theory following the Commander-in-Chief , there is a second tradition -
rebellion by hapless blundering. Prison torture, carried out by mercenaries reporting directly to Rumsfeld, is revealed
by military photos. Oops. This goes beyond information leaks, it affects deployment and cooperation, and if blundering
does not suffice, then refusal begins.
Bush may think that firing a top general will set an example to the rest, and stop what has become increasingly an
open rebellion in the military, but the opposite will be the effect. For every head cut off, more will grow. Bush sees the
grim military faces, forced to attend his frequent pep talks to the public using them as backdrops, and imagines this
cooperation. Has he not noticed the smiles fading? The lack of applause, even on orders? The word gets down to the
lower echelons, that the officers no longer consider Bush their commander, and rebellion is afoot. This flashes about on
the Internet as rumors of a coup, but this is not the result. The result is increasing refusal to follow direct orders. Up
and down the line. Just how many court martials can the military entertain, simultaneously? Historically, when a
military turns against a king, the king has lost his footing and is doomed. This is particularly so when the king
foolishly starts attacking the military! But such is the arrogance of those in the White House at present, who think
themselves impervious to corruption trials with an Attorney General long a close personal friend of Bush, and
impervious to impeachment trials with a Republican House and Senate, and impervious to public and world opinion as
the assignment of a hated UN envoy recently shows.
What next? A Shakespearean drama is about to unfold, with the synergy of undercutting of the Bush Administration
creating a maelstrom under him that will astonish those who thought him strong. Bush busting, a decapitation of his
influence such that the US is no longer run from the White House, but is on auto-pilot according to law and
conscience. Such is the Puppet Masters plan, and there has not been a battle instigated by this Puppet Master than he
has lost. The outcome is certain.
Signs of the Times #1488
Four-star general sacked [Aug 10] 'In an extraordinary move, the Army sacked a four-star general
who was the subject of a Defense Department investigation into alleged sexual misconduct, an
official said Tuesday. Gen. Kevin P. Byrnes, commander of Army Training and Doctrine Command,
was approaching retirement when the decision to relieve him of duty was. Byrnes, 55, a Vietnam
veteran, ranked third in seniority among the Army's 11 four-star generals. In his position as
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta236.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:22 AM]
ZetaTalk: Decapitation Process
commander of Training and Doctrine Command, Byrnes oversaw all Army training programs and
the development of war-fighting guidelines. Among the four-star general or flag officers to have
been relieved of command in recent years was Navy Adm. Richard C. Macke, sacked as commander
of Pacific Command in 1995 for remarks he made about the case of U.S. Marines accused of raping
a 12-year-old Japanese girl. Gen. Michael Dugan was fired as chief of staff of the Air Force in
1990 for comments to reporters about planning for the 1991 Gulf War.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta236.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:22 AM]
ZetaTalk: Countering Fraud
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Countering Fraud
written Nov 9, 2006
Resurgent Democrats Win Control of House [Nov 8] Democrats won control of the House early
Wednesday after a dozen years of Republican rule in a resounding repudiation of a war, a president and a
scandal-scarred Congress. Republicans fell from power in every region of the country - conservative,
liberal and moderate - as well as in every type of district - urban, rural and suburban. Exit polls showed
middle class voters who fled
to the GOP a dozen years ago appeared to return to the Democrats. [and
from another] Democrats Need Va., Mont. to Take Senate [Nov 8] Democrats captured four of the six
Republican-held seats they needed to take control of the Senate, winning critical contests in Ohio, Rhode
Island, Pennsylvania and Missouri, and inched closer Wednesday to erasing the GOP's majority.
Democrats mounted challenges for two remaining Republican-held seats in Virginia and Montana - and
were ahead in both. [and from another] With 99% of the votes counted, Webb maintains a slight lead:
There are 30,000 uncounted ballots reported from pro-Webb Fairfax County. Election workers have gone
home for the evening and will resume counting in the morning. There were still uncounted votes in
strongly pro-Webb Arlington County, Fairfax City, and Isle of Wight. A few votes remained to be counted
in evenly split Loudoun County. [and from another] The exit polls that leaked out in the late afternoon
ended up matching the final results almost exactly -- nothing like what happened in those other Bush-era
elections. The razor-close races all broke late for the Democrats, unlike Florida in 2000 or Ohio in 2004,
and when that happened, there were no major charges of fraud, and no demand for a recount.
Nancy promised that after the election we would share some of what went on behind the scenes in our efforts, in
concert with the Puppet Master's resources, to counter voter fraud. Where we will not divulge all aspects of this team
effort, nor the techniques used, we will discuss some of this as it is by now well known to Karl Rove and company and
thus no point in withholding this information from the public. Rove's team had lined up thousands of individuals across
the country, in key battleground states, to effect voter fraud. He had layers, such that if the lower layer failed, another
higher up would be in place, one or the other sure to succeed. To effect a sense of reality, the vote would be designed
to go the way the local populace would vote for all but the key federal elections, as was done for the 2004 fraud. Thus,
it would seem the voters were matching the polls on all but the federal question. Bush and Cheney and Rove and