Online Read Free Novel
  • Home
  • Romance & Love
  • Fantasy
  • Science Fiction
  • Mystery & Detective
  • Thrillers & Crime
  • Actions & Adventure
  • History & Fiction
  • Horror
  • Western
  • Humor

    Behind the Backlash

    Prev Next


      noticeable and most frequently vilified members of their communities.

      Those persons who were not as easily recognizable as muslim also

      suffered from the backlash, albeit sometimes in different ways. in essence,

      these individuals could “pass” as non-muslim because of their skin colors,

      decisions not to wear islamic attire, or lack of formal religious affiliations.

      These muslim men and women were consequently much less likely to be the

      primary targets of discriminatory actions. nonetheless, they often witnessed

      discrimination directed toward other muslims or Arabs. These experiences

      were personally painful and also confirmed the severity of islamophobic

      religious prejudice and anti-Arab ethnic bias in the general public.

      Verbal Harassment and Intimidation

      muslim Americans became the targets of widespread verbal abuse in the

      aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. nearly 80 percent of the muslims in this study

      reported that they were personally verbally harassed or in the immediate

      proximity of a friend or family member who was ridiculed in the weeks and

      months following 9/11. participants were called vulgar names, shouted or

      cursed at in the street or from passing cars, and subjected to disparaging

      remarks in public settings. most often, these insults came from strangers.

      However, neighbors, acquaintances, classmates, teachers, and co-workers

      were also responsible for some instances of verbal harassment.

      The interviewees offered a long list of derogatory names that they or their

      muslim peers or family members had been called after 9/11. “Terrorist,” “dirty

      muslim,” “camel jockey,” “rag head,” “towel head,” “sand roach,” and “sand

      n-gger” were all epithets that were mumbled or yelled at males and females. As

      noted in the previous chapter, the participants had been called many of these

      names before 9/11. After the terrorist attacks, the interviewees heard these

      offensive slurs much more often and in a wider variety of contexts.

      in addition to these more familiar anti-muslim insults, the respondents

      were also referred to in new and disparaging ways that were clearly

      associated with the 9/11 atrocities. For example, the men reported they were

      called “Osama” or “Taliban,” while some of the women were referred to as

      “Osama’s goats” and were told to “take off the burqa.”4 salman, who was born

      in Afghanistan, explained how he was treated by a woman whom he had just

      met: “i told someone that i’m from Afghanistan, an older woman. she was

      like, ‘Oh, my God, we have bin laden in the house.’ This didn’t shock me at

      all. Before 9/11, people hardly even knew where Afghanistan was. now when

      Backlash / 65

      i tell someone i’m from Afghanistan, they’ll probably treat me in a certain

      way, or they’ll probably think about me in a different way than before.”

      najah described what happened to her and her friends, all of whom were

      wearing headscarves, when they exited the subway in Harlem:

      nobody abused me physically, but i got a lot of verbal slang. One

      time, my friends and i were coming out of the subway, and we were

      all hijabis [women wearing headscarves]. Two guys, when they saw

      us, they started joking to each other. They were saying, “let’s go kill

      all of Osama’s goats.” i looked at them and i started laughing. it was

      like, “What does this have to do with me?” But then i realized that

      they were talking about us.

      several other respondents encountered hostility as they navigated city

      streets. in their research on African Americans and discrimination, Joe

      Feagin and melvin sikes note that public streets represent some of the

      least-protected sites in our society. Consequently, racial minorities are

      continually at risk for verbal abuse as they move through these open places.5

      religiously motivated harassment may follow a similar pattern, as evidenced

      by the numerous problems with verbal attacks that muslims faced in public

      locations in the aftermath of 9/11. Badia, who lived in Colorado in the fall

      of 2001, talked about her experiences as she would walk near her home: “Of

      course, generally, Americans are really nice, very friendly people. But i was

      really surprised about how rude and ignorant some people were after 9/11. i

      remember walking down the street and people saying stuff, yelling stuff like

      ‘terrorist, terrorist.’ i really didn’t think Americans would be like that.”

      many other muslim men and women indicated that they were shouted

      at by people in passing cars. The episodes they described involved animosity

      against other nations: “When i was walking down [a busy street in Denver],

      i saw this guy driving down the street, and this guy yelled out his window,

      ‘F— pakistan!’”

      sometimes people were cursed at because they were perceived to be Arab,

      as was the case with this south Asian man: “Once i had picked up my sister, i

      was walking my sister back home. This man said, ‘Get out of here, you f—ing

      Arabs.’ i’m like, ‘That’s funny, because nobody here is an Arab. Who’s an

      Arab?’ it’s just ignorance.”

      And other times, the person hurling the insult drew on demeaning

      stereotypes, as an Arab American woman described: “i was walking down

      the street after work, minding my own business, and some kid stuck his head

      out the window of the back seat of a car and called me a terrorist. Then they

      turned the corner. i was expecting them to turn all the way around and come

      after me. i just turned around and started to run.”

      66 / Chapter 4

      These hateful words not only were emotionally painful but also induced

      fear and served as a reminder of the risks associated with traversing public

      settings. As the last quote shows, muslims were aware that at any moment

      these verbal confrontations could turn into physical altercations, should the

      harasser “turn around” and “come after” them.

      some people directed their anger at muslims by yelling, “Go back to your

      country” and other taunts grounded in the misconception that muslims

      cannot be native-born citizens. As discussed in the previous chapter, muslim

      Americans are no strangers to this “perpetual-foreigner” stereotype. Following

      9/11, however, these encounters took on a much more hostile tone. selina,

      a second-generation pakistani American who was born and raised in new

      york, emphasized the pain associated with verbal harassment: “it really hurts.

      you’ve been living here, and i hate it when somebody says, ‘Go back to your

      country; go back home.’ This is my home. i live here. Who the hell are you to

      tell me? Honestly, that’s the way i feel. i’ll just give them a dirty look. i try not

      to answer. But it really hurts. i can’t see myself living anywhere else but here.”

      The rise in anti-immigrant and especially anti-Arab and anti-muslim

      rhetoric in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks likely encouraged this

      particular form of verbal bigotry. indeed, a number of media pundits and

      conservative political and religious figures depicted America as a country

      virtually overrun with hordes of violent, subversive muslims. For instance,

     
    televangelist pat robertson, speaking on the Christian Broadcasting

      network’s 700 Club program, said, “Our immigration policies are now

      so skewed towards the middle east and away from europe that we have

      introduced these people into our midst and undoubtedly there are terrorist

      cells all over them. . . . They want to coexist until they can control, dominate,

      and then if need be, destroy.”6 Columnist stanley Crouch of new york’s Daily

      News wrote:

      We have had war declared on us by a spider at the center of a web

      of terrorist cells. Followers of that spider are hiding in the Arab

      American community. no one doubts this. no one. in fact, it should

      bother all of us that a moratorium was not declared on immigration

      from the middle east after the 1993 attack on the Twin Towers, espe-

      cially since most of those identified with 9/11 arrived here after that

      time. if more Americans are murdered by people who are part of the

      terrorist web from the middle east and successfully hiding out in a

      certain community, the response is going to have less to do with any

      kind of bigotry than with the icy nature of war.7

      Commentators also questioned the loyalty of muslims and cast doubt

      on whether they could ever fully assimilate to “American” values and ideals.

      Backlash / 67

      in november 2001, William s. lind, director for the Center for Cultural

      Conservatism at the Free Congress Foundation, argued, “There is no such

      thing as a peaceful islam. . . . islamics [ sic] cannot fit into an America in

      which the first loyalty is to the American Constitution. They should be

      encouraged to leave. They are a fifth column in this country.”8 lind and

      his colleague paul m. Weyrich also published a pamphlet entitled “Why

      islam is a Threat to America and the West.” Their pamphlet states plainly,

      “We do believe islam is at war with the Christian West, and we are proud

      to be considered spokesmen for that view.” Weyrich later warned, “They’re

      [muslims] going to, at some point or another, attack us. it’s like having a

      giant fifth column in your own country.”9

      With this kind of derisive speech increasingly making its way into

      mainstream media, it is no wonder that a 2002 national survey found that

      nearly 60 percent of Americans favored reducing the number of immigrants

      admitted to the United states from muslim countries.10 Another poll,

      also conducted in 2002, showed that the majority of Americans believed

      there were “too many” immigrants from Arab countries.11 several surveys

      carried out in the days following the 9/11 attacks suggested that a significant

      minority of Americans felt mistrustful toward the Arabs and muslims living

      in their midst: 43 percent of Americans said that 9/11 would make them

      more suspicious of people whom they thought were Arab; 35 percent said

      they had less trust in Arabs living in the United states than previously; 27

      percent admitted to feeling less favorably toward Arab Americans since 9/11;

      and about 33 percent said they had heard friends, neighbors, or co-workers

      make negative comments about Arabs or muslims.12

      As the American public grew more wary of Arabs and muslims, mem-

      bers of these communities began to receive increasingly hostile inquiries

      concerning everything from their religious beliefs to their perspectives on

      terrorism. The men and women in this study reported that they were regularly

      asked whether they were “glad” or “happy” that the terrorists destroyed the

      World Trade Center towers. The following remark sharply underscores how

      dehumanizing these experiences were: “some people are like, ‘Are you happy

      it happened?’ some people have said that to me. you’re kind of like . . . what

      do you even say to that? it’s like the mentality that people literally have is that

      muslims and people from the middle east aren’t normal human beings.”

      The presumption of guilt by religious association was even more painful

      when it was friends or colleagues—people who knew the muslim men and

      women prior to 9/11—who were compelled to ask how muslims felt about the

      murder of nearly three thousand innocent people: “A friend of my husband,

      he called and said, ‘How do you feel about the whole thing? Are you happy?’

      Then he left a message, ‘God bless America.’ We’re like, ‘Okay, now we know

      which way you stand.’”

      68 / Chapter 4

      The woman quoted above said her husband ultimately chose to end

      the relationship with the man who called and left the hostile message. she

      described the ordeal as “intensely stressful,” because her husband had been

      friends with the man for many years before 9/11.

      After the terrorist attacks, patriotic sentiment surged in the United

      states, expressed through signs and songs that represent American strength

      and identity. For many Americans, displaying such symbols as the American

      flag reaffirmed their loyalty to the nation and allowed them to show their

      solidarity with others. in some instances, however, patriotic displays were

      used to harm and to isolate muslims. For example, sirah, a lebanese

      American woman, recounted how a man began singing “The star spangled

      Banner” when he saw her. she was certain the incident occurred because

      of her visibility as a muslim: “i was wearing a hijab to school, and a big

      American white guy looked at me and sang the American anthem in a loud

      voice, in the subway. it was like he was singing it to me.” As a consequence

      of this incident, sirah was left feeling as though patriotism was being used as

      a cover for anti-muslim bigotry.13 she sadly commented, “many people say,

      ‘We love America.’ But to me that means, ‘We hate muslims.’”

      The 9/11 attacks introduced a new sense of vulnerability into the American

      psyche. spaces that were formerly considered safe are now approached with

      unease. High-rise structures, once regarded as extraordinary feats of human

      engineering, are viewed today as potential terror targets. national monuments

      and government buildings are envisioned as fair game for nefarious terrorist

      plots. A feeling of danger is associated with activities that draw large crowds

      of people together, such as sporting events and music concerts. And, if aircraft

      are at risk in the post-9/11 era, so, too, are trains, buses, subways, bridges,

      ports, and dams. The list of threats is seemingly endless, and incessant

      warnings from government officials to “stay alert” remind Americans that

      another attack could happen at any time in any number of locations.

      since 9/11, muslims have been treated with suspicion and contempt as

      they enter public spaces that antiterrorism experts have labeled “potential

      targets.” in the months following 9/11, the interviewees who relied on public

      transportation received a slew of comments, which ranged from angry

      outbursts to feeble attempts at humor. The accounts below came from two

      young muslim women in the fall of 2001. The first respondent was waiting to

      catch a train in new Jersey, and the second, a university student, was taking

      a bus home from manhattan for the Thanksgiving holiday:

      i went to new Jersey. i w
    as coming back, and i was waiting for the

      train. This guy, he goes to me, “Before you blow up this train station,

      just let me know so i can get my ass out of here.” i just laughed and

      looked at him and said, “Okay, sure.”

      Backlash / 69

      Thanksgiving, i took Greyhound. i was so tired. midterms had just

      finished. i was carrying all these bags. There was a huge line, because

      they were checking everything. Only ticketed passengers could go in

      the line. Usually they don’t do that. By the time i actually got on the

      bus, i was extremely exhausted. The second i got on, the first person

      sitting right by the door goes, “Oh, my God, there’s going to be a

      bomb on the bus.” He said it loud enough so the whole bus heard it.

      i’m the kind who would stand up for myself, but i was way too tired

      that day.

      some of the episodes of verbal harassment were more indirect, such

      as when people would make comments loud enough for the muslim men

      or women to hear but not explicitly to their faces. For instance, Thana,

      a second-generation pakistani American, found that when she would

      visit restaurants or other public accommodations, fellow patrons would

      sometimes intentionally engage in muslim bashing: “i have sat down, and

      people have come and sat down next to me. They’re having a conversation

      loud enough so specifically i can hear them. They want me to hear them, and

      they’ll be slamming islam, and they’ll be saying things about muslim suicide

      bombers and all this. . . . it’s just like, do you honestly believe the things you

      are saying?”

      Another interviewee, laila, also faced indirect verbal abuse. As she told

      her story, it was clear how hurt she was by the incident. laila and her cousin’s

      family, whom she lived with in lower manhattan, were evacuated for several

      weeks following the collapse of the Twin Towers. When they were finally

      allowed to return to their ash-covered apartment, they were mistreated by

      another resident who had also been displaced:

      you have to give iDs in four different places just to get back to my

      cousin’s apartment. We had our luggage, because we stayed some-

      where else. so coming back, we’re carrying backpacks and suitcases.

      We had a lot of stuff. There was this one guy who also lives in that

     


    Prev Next
Online Read Free Novel Copyright 2016 - 2026